Paper 1 Question 1
(a)
4-19-2022
Dear, The President of France
Over the course of these few weeks, I can only imagine the amount of stress you have endured and have been undergoing. I know you must be extremely grateful for the many people who have come together to rebuild your proud home, the amount of donations you have received is sensational.
However, I can not begin to imagine the amount of guilt you must feel as people are attacking you in the fact that your country got more attention for going into flames in three minutes versus the Amazon in three weeks. As it may not be in your doing for how the world reacted to both of these tragedies, it is not too late to say something.
Most people are upset since the very destructive and catastrophic fire that occurred in Notre Dame is getting more attention than the Amazon. The highlighted factor of that is the Amazon being the most exotic and healthy part of the world. As it is known, as the lungs of the earth, for being the most produced oxygen in a specific area. It is strictly clean air that is said to slow down global warming.
Moreover, people blame France for the Amazon for not getting the same amount of attention even a fraction of the time. If you, Mr. The President would stand up and produce an opinion about it. I think that many people would listen to you, and some might even act on it. As it is not okay for what is happening right now in the contrasts of attention and the actions taken on the Amazon's fire compared to the Notre Dame.
(b)
Overall the format, structure, and language of the news report greatly differ from the letter. The genre of the text presented is a non-fiction, first-person narrative. Which is formed in a news report, whose target audience is likely to be those who are interested or invested in the comparison of the two fires and the attention each of them got or those who are particularly curious about the entirety of the debate. The news report added a headline to educate and tell the audience what they will be reading about, which is prominent in every news report. While the genre of the text that I provided is a non-fiction, first-person narrative. Which is formed in a letter, whose target audience is the president of France as I directly stated “Dear, The President of France”
The structure of the news report is in chronological order as it states the orders of events that happened with details and how the people reacted. Continuing with the writer's structure, all of the paragraphs were short to allow the readers to absorb the information gradually as they read the factual information and the order of events in which they occurred. Some of the paragraphs strictly consisted of only one sentence, to fully address the audience and have them completely grasp what the author is trying to convey. The author keeps the paragraphs short so that the audience does lose interest or forget what they are reading, this structure of writing keeps the audience interested the whole time.
While the letter consists of shorter paragraphs for the same reasoning, it does not have one lined paragraph as it is staying formal. The letter addresses the audience in the first line and continues its structure by shorter paragraphs so that the audience is fully engaged in what the letter is saying. Additionally, by doing this it ensures that there is no repetition and not one word is wasted.
In the news report, the author used repetition in his language the majority of the time. The author repeated the phrases; “three whole weeks”, and “build a new earth.” These two phrases were constantly repeated throughout the new report to make clear the point it was trying to make. That being that the people are upset about the contrasts of attention and the actions taken on the Amazon's fire compared to the Notre Dame. Continuing with the language of the news report, the author decided to quote some of the people's opinions and they used informal contractions that are short forms of other words that people use when speaking casually. They are not exactly slang, but they are a little like slang. For example, "gonna" is a short form of "going to” which is used in the text. The author provided real people's quotes on the topic to add an emotional effect on the audience. Emotive words and phrases like “slip away”, “destroyed”, and “it's gone” were used in the people's quotes. Here the author highlights the emotional aspect in grabbing a hold of the audience emotionally, to hopefully make them feel what the people are feeling, just by reading what they have to say.
Continuing with the language aspect, In the letter, I used a lexical field of sadness as I used the words; “upset”, “guilt”, and “stress” these words are used to have the audience feel empathetic towards themself and see the problems in which have arose from the writer. I used an emotional apple, as did the news article, but in its unique way. The new reports strictly only had an emotional appeal from the people's point of view, while I transferred from first person to second person, as I stated “If you”, to grab ahold of the solo targeted audience and create an emotional set off from the fact that I am writing at him rather than two him.
Hello Charli,
ReplyDeleteFor your AO1 for Section A Question 1a, you received 3 marks as you did have a clear understanding of the text with explaining how he should have some guilt about people attacking him for just the Notre-Dame being covered in flames in 3 minutes over the Amazon which has been on fire for the last 3 weeks with him taking action about the situation. You have some clear characteristic features with using the appropriate lexis to address the situation like with saying, ‘amount of guilt’ which shows an example of your characteristic features.
For your AO2, you received 4 marks with you having an effective expression on the letter of using phrases such as, ‘extremely grateful’, and ‘it is not okay’ which does show how these words can be effective towards the president. With your content being relevant to the President and purpose about it not being too late to say something that could have these people listen to him about the situation.
For your AO1 for 1b, you received 3 marks for having a clear understanding of the text by going over the difference between the news report and the letter you wrote along with addressing the audience to whom it’s going, such as the president of France for your letter. You have some clear references of characteristic features with the syntax being clear on explaining the comparison of the two.
For your AO3, you received 5 marks with how you clearly did explain your analysis of form, structure, and language like form, you said that the new report’s audience is the people who are interested in the comparison of the two fires, while the audience for the letter is the President of France. For structure you stated that the news report is in chronological order, while the letter consisted of shorter paragraphs for the reader to understand. For language you stated that the news report utilized a reputation of the phrases, ‘three whole weeks’ and ‘build a new earth’ but for the letter, you said that you utilized a lexical field of sadness to make the audience feel empathetic about the situation which is smart of you doing this. Finally, the stylistic choices that relate to the audience and explanation are great with you being able to explain your points and tie it into how the reader would understand it.
Good job!
15/25
Charli, your blog is clear and properly structured and you do a good job of utilizing pieces from the news report in your letter and using proper language to address the President of France.
ReplyDeleteFor Question 1(a) for AO1 you scored 3/5 marks for being able to effectively address the President using formal and professional language that serves its purpose of addressing a person in a position of authority..
For Question 1(a) for AO2 you scored 2/5 marks for your written letter because of your ability to describe the aim of your letter to the President which is slightly unclear in some of the phrases you use. For example ‘as it may not be your doing’ and ‘as you Mr. The President’ aren’t fit for the purpose of the letter and don’t flow well.
For Question 1(b) for AO1 you scored 3/5 marks for your comparison of the texts and the different form, structures and language used in each. Your response would be stronger if you have a deeper analysis of the purpose shown in the language and the use of language given the context.
For Question 1(b) for AO3 you scored 4/10 marks for your comparison of language elements in both the letter and the news report. You show a basic understanding of the texts but your analysis is vague and lacks discussion of many characteristic features used in the letter that differs from the news report.